Samma lärare – olika praktiker?: en studie av literacy och meningsskapande i grundskolans tidiga ämnesundervisning

Monica Egelström vill med sin avhandling bland annat bidra till kunskaper om skolämnen som arenor för elevers literacyutveckling och meningsskapande.

Fakta
Disputation

2019-04-05

Titel (sv)

Samma lärare – olika praktiker?: en studie av literacy och meningsskapande i grundskolans tidiga ämnesundervisning

Titel (eng)

Same teachers – different practices? : a study of literacy and meaning making in early subject area instruction

Författare

Monica Egelström

Handledare

Eva Lindgren, Umeå universitet Docent Ewa Bergqvist, Umeå universitet Docent Ulla Damber, Mittuniversitetet

Opponent

Professor Anders Arnqvist, Karlstads Universitet

Institution

Institutionen för språkstudier

Lärosäte

Umeå universitet

Länkar
Läs hela avhandlingen (pdf)
Läs pressmeddelande
Läs Skolportens intervju med Monica Egelström

Abstract in English:

This thesis focuses on school subjects as arenas for students’ literacy develop-ment and meaning making. How instructional practices are formed create dif-ferent preconditions for students’ opportunities of literacy development and meaning making. The following questions have been explored: 1) How is in-struction in mathematics and history organized and structured as precondi-tions for literacy practices?, 2) What instructional practices for literacy deve-lopment and meaning making can be found in the school subjects mathema-tics and history?, and 3) How can existing instruction be used to formulate a zone of proximal development for educational practices in relation to stu-dents’ literacy development and meaning making?
Four teachers and their instruction in mathematics and history in 5th grade (students typically 11 years old) were followed. Classroom observations and teacher interviews were used as methods for data collection. Teacher inter-views were carried out before, during, and after observational periods. The study draws on theories of literacy as situated practices (Barton & Hamilton, 2000; Street, 1984). For the analysis activity theory (Engeström, 2015; Leon-tiev, 1986) was used to create understandings of the two school subjects as human activity systems. To identify literacy practices within these systems au-tonomous and ideological models of literacy (Street, 1984) were used together with models of important resources (Freebody & Luke, 1990) and discourses (Ivanič, 2004) of literacy.
The results indicate that school subjects can be understood as different ac-tivity systems. Mathematics and history instruction were directed at different objects, in relation to content but also in how the object was perceived by the teachers as subjects. The activity system and its object had consequences for the role of the teacher subject in the system, but also for student roles. Diffe-rent objects were also linked to differences in how the class was considered as community of work and how division of labor was formed in this community. Differences in the activity systems seemed to be related to differences in lite-racy practices. The activity systems were at least partly related to different models of literacy and which resources and discourses of literacy were pre-sented to students. Different communities of work implied different opportu-nities to use joint work as a tool for meaning making. Likewise, actions seemed differently linked as chains of literacy events in the two activity systems. Im-portant, though, in both subjects a tertiary contradiction could be identified, which indicate a zone of proximal development for both subjects in relation to students’ literacy development and meaning making.

Sidan publicerades 2019-03-26 11:04 av Susanne Sawander
Sidan uppdaterades 2019-04-16 09:21 av Susanne Sawander


Konferenser
Fortbildning
Rektor i förskolan

Rektor i förskolan

Den här konferensen fokuserar på din roll som chef och ledare med högaktuella föreläsningar om det pedagogiska ledarskapet och din professionsutveckling. Hur leder du i förändring och hur görs en nulägesanalys? Vi tar avstamp i de frågor som är specifika för förskolans verksamhet, men belyser även ämnen utifrån din yrkesroll som chef över en mångbottnad verksamhet.

Läs mer och boka plats
SKOLPORTENS MAGASIN
Tema: Skolans styrning
  Skolporten nr 3/2019 – ute 16 maj

Tema: Skolans styrning

Sveriges rektorer slits mellan budgetkrav och elevers rätt till likvärdig utbildning. Intervjun: Didaktikforskaren Simon Hjort vill utbilda framtidens tänkare. Reportage: Lekens betydelse i förskolan. +Skolportens favorit: Så skapas rektors pedagogiska ledarskap. +Så väcker vi tjejers teknikintresse. +Unga kämpar för bättre sexualundervisning.

Läs mer här!
Kommande disputationer
Lediga tjänster
Fler platsannonser
5 mest lästa på FoU

Innehåll viktigare än skärmtid för små barn

Hur påverkas de yngsta barnen av att använda surfplattor och smarta telefoner? WHO avråder från att barn under två år överhuvudtaget ska använda skärmar. Andra forskare menar att i ett digitalt samhälle behöver barn börja klicka på digitala enheter så tidigt som möjligt. Vad de tittar på är viktigare än hur länge.

Evolution: as a religious professor of science education, we need to rethink how we teach it

It is not for educators to forcefully convert doubters into accepting evolution, but to build an inclusive classroom that respects religious students’ beliefs.

A strong finish to the school year

Smart ideas for keeping students engaged as summer arrives.

Alma Memisevic: De inkluderade – Samtidens oönskade barn

Drömmen om en skola där elever kommer till skolan för att lära sig och förverkliga sina framtidsdrömmar och ambitioner samt bidra till samhället utifrån sina egna intressen, behov, förmågor och förutsättningar, känns som ren utopi, skriver Alma Memisevic, specialpedagog, förskollärare och doktorand vid Linköpings universitet.

What’s the right age to quit maths?

Unlike in many other countries, young people in the US must take maths until they leave school. Now arts students in New York are staging a rebellion over it. So what is the right time to quit studying maths?