Forskning och utveckling kategorier
The myths of instructional leadership: conceptual drift, construct ambiguity, and the limits of principal-centered reform
This essay examines six persistent myths: that the principal is ‘the instructional leader’; that instructional leadership is the principal’s only responsibility; that it is enacted through top-down authority; that it directly influences student learning; that it focuses on teaching rather than learning; and that it is at odds with social justice leadership. (pdf)
